<font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">Hey, what's shakin'Originally posted by Alex:
Wow, I sure feel validated about my gripes about digital. I think Digital is great, but it's a sleazy technology because it can be watered down, diluted and in the process create false trails of evidence.
Check This Out
Super8 in the digital age, what an exciting forum! I love digital editing- (even though I wouldn't touch a digital camera with a 300 foot pole) you can edit, add your own sound and produce DVD's without having to do all that slpicing. Isn't it great? All I have to do is pay for film, developing & MiniDV transfer. Sweet.
But when it comes time for the film festival showing, they have to use a digital projector, right? I've seen a few DV movies projected on the big screen and in all honestly, it just looks like c r a p! We're talking major pixelation, candy cane lines around edges, and even intermitant color noise. Horrible! I wonder if it would look that way with a digitally editied Super 8mm movie. ???
I asked a film professional once if I could have my edited Super8 movie trasferred (blown up) from MiniDV or DVD to 35mm for play at theatres. He laughed and asked me what I thought would happen to an image that started out the size of a pencil eraser if it were blown up thousands of times. Needless to say I didn't inquire about it any further. But he did mention something called "digi-Beta", saying that if I shot in at least 16mm and editied on this Digi-Beta, that the computer output could then be transferred to 35mm with a minnimal loss of quality.
But I wanna do super8! Isn't there a way?



Bookmarks